Beware if you invest in a company via a company. You pay corporation tax on the gain arising when the company sells its investment and then more tax on dividends paid to extract the gain into your personal hands. This compares with individuals who invest personally and who may then obtain entrepreneur’s relief and pay only 10% tax.
This warning results from a meeting with one unfortunate entrepreneur. He invested in a start up, acquiring shares, via his wholly owned company (Holdco). The tax consequences can be disastrous but this does depend upon your personal circumstances. More tax efficient choices could include:
The start-up company, called Start-up, developed some compelling software. The company succeeded. Holdco, besides holding Start-up shares, also received modest streams of consultancy income.
Holdco will sell it’s Start-up shares during the next investment round. Probably Holdco will receive a seven figure sum, an amount that significantly exceeds Holdco’s current trading assets.
Applause all round. BUT….. how to transfer Start-up’s sale proceeds into our entrepreneur’s hands tax efficiently. It is complicated. There are two stages to consider:
In the UK, companies can make capital gains free of corporation tax, if they satisfy the substantial shareholding exemption. The legislation is complex. There are tricky time limits. Broadly, the company realising the gain must be either:
Unfortunately Holdco had to pay corporation tax on the share sale proceeds. Holdco failed to satisfy both exemption:s
Generally, HMRC says to qualify as a “trading company”, no more than approximately 20% of the company’s assets can arise from non-trading sources. But HMRC has not published:
HMRC is prepared to consider goodwill as part of the assets, even although goodwill is not on the balance sheet. The value attributed to goodwill depends on the facts, trading history, and nature of the business.
Holdco passed the 10% holding test, but failed the “trading company” requirement. Holdco’s trading income was not 80% greater than its Start-up’s share sale proceeds. If Holdco managed a portfolio of routinely traded companies, then it may have passed.
Unfortunately, Holdco also failed the “joint venture company” requirements. 75% of Start-up’s shares were not controlled by five, or fewer, shareholders. This is common after multiple investment rounds, in which high net worth investors subscribed for shares via angel networks.
After Holdco pays corporation tax, the question is how to transfer cash to the entrepreneur. The most tax efficient means would be a dividend payment. However, it’s best to avoid large dividend payments in one tax year, as it spikes the rate of tax. It is more tax-efficient to spread dividend payments over multiple years.
Alternatively, we could wind up Holdco. However, this constitutes a deemed distribution for capital gains tax purposes. At the time, for a higher rate tax payer:
The entrepreneur could transfer shares to a spouse or civil partner. This would reduce the tax burden for both the dividend and distribution options. However, there may be family related complications.
Our entrepreneur’s day to day involvement in Start-up qualified him for Entrepreneur’s Relief, if he had directly held the shares. Entrepreneur’s Relief allows a CGT rate of 10% for qualifying gains. So on a £1 million gain, our entrepreneur would pay £100,000 tax, instead of five times that amount.
EIS, SEIS and Entrepreneur’s Relief are not tax avoidance schemes, but when properly used, provide incentives. All these schemes require individuals to invest personally, rather than via companies.
You do need to look at the position carefully. Sometimes, there are good reasons to invest via a company. For example, property acquisitions may be best dealt with via a company rather than held personally.