The Next Alexa? Surfing the IP Challenges for Artificial Intelligence
13 September 2018
Just because you have been the victim of a breach of contract, does that mean you are entitled to breach of contract damages – and if so, how much will they be? It is critical, before beginning a claim, to evaluate realistically what it might be worth.
Most people are aware when a breach of contract has occurred and that an award of damages could arise but few know how the award of damages will be made up. Few know whether you really will be compensated. An award of damages can be made up of various elements, some less obvious and less common than others. It is important for a party who has a claim for breach of contract against a defaulting party to consider any likely award of damages before issuing a claim. We can then check whether the claim is worthwhile.
Damages are usually awarded to an injured party to compensate for any loss suffered as a result of the defaulting party’s actions or non-actions. However, on rare occasions damages can be assessed on a non-compensatory basis. The purpose of an award of damages for breach of contract is to put the injured party in the position it would have been in had the contract been performed.
Consider the following steps when assessing damages:
This is normally the date used for the assessment of damages.
This includes costs or liabilities incurred by the injured party to a third party. It also includes any profits which may be lost by the injured party as a result of the breach.
Often, the injured party can pay a third party to reinstate it to the position it would have been in had the contract been performed. This cost may be recovered by the injured party if the cost was incurred reasonably. A party can still receive damages even if a cure is not undertaken. Note, a claimant has to mitigate its loss, not aggravate it.
This may occur where the injured party’s staff had to investigate the breach or deal with the consequences of the breach. The injured party may recover its staff’s wages. However, this type of claim can be difficult to prove.
If a buyer of goods refuses to accept the delivered goods, refuses to pay for them or where the goods have not been delivered at all then the damages are presumed to be the difference between the market value of the goods and the contract price.
The damages in this case would be the difference between the value of the goods at the time of delivery and the value of the goods had they not been defective.
There are narrow exceptions which apply to allow certain non-pecuniary damage to be recovered. It must be established that an important object of the contract was to give pleasure or relaxation, for example a holiday. This type of award will be rare in commercial cases.
The injured party must consider the position it was in after the breach and the position it would have been “but for” the breach – which of course is hypothetical.
This means that the injured party has taken reasonable steps to avoid or reduce its loss and has not acted unreasonably to increase its loss.
The loss must be in the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was made, i.e. it flows directly and naturally from the breach, or was reasonably foreseeable.
It can be difficult for parties to a contract to assess and quantify what damages may be recovered where a breach of contract has occurred. It is usually worth seeking advice on these issues before bringing a claim in order to determine whether it is viable and whether a deal can be done without the need for litigation.
John Deane is a partner in the commercial dispute team. Prior to bringing a claim, it will be necessary to seek legal advice on both liability, and if that can be proved, the expected loss. We assess both aspects for you.